Saturday, 27 December 2014
Political Analysis of India: Maximum Contradictions and Common Minimum Program ...
Political Analysis of India: Maximum Contradictions and Common Minimum Program ...: The last assemble result of the Jammu & Kashmir have a clear indication that there is complete differences have emerged between the r...
Maximum Contradictions and Common Minimum Program is the New Mantra of BJP
The last
assemble result of the Jammu & Kashmir have a clear indication that there
is complete differences have emerged between the residents of Jammu and
Kashmir. If the BJP have succeeded to get majority of seat from the Jammu, it
was because of the Hindu population dominating the Jammu, the same BJP did not
achieved any seats from The Kashmir and Laddhak.
One cannot
ignore that there is vast difference of opinion between the two religions section
and the fractured mandate is the outcome of the same difference of religious
feeling.
It has been
found during the election campaign in J&K that speeches, were made to
confuse and woo the voters, which are no more relevant in the present scenario,
after the fractured mandate.
The new situation
growing for the formation of the new Govt., which have erupted after the
fractured mandate, have belied the earlier statements made by the PM Modi, who
was vociferous against the Father- son and Father – daughter rule, in J&K.
Actually, Mr. Modi wanted to say against the dynasty rule of the state, which
rotate around the two families and Modi wanted to free J&K from the two
families, which have worked in Jammu region, than other part of the J&K.
On the other
hand, the National Conference (NC) and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) have
left no stone unturned to connivance the Muslims voters of J&K that the BJP
is a communal party and have also assured not to come close to the BJP, at any
situation.
But, the
present situation dictates that if PDP have to form the Govt, then they have to
come close to BJP, leaving aside their earlier stand of uniting with the
communal party, like BJP.
The present
hobnobbing of the BJP with PDP and NC for the formulation of govt. formation
and be in the Govt. clearly indicate that Article 70, Common Civil Code and Ram
Mandir issues are no more important for the BJP, if somehow, the BJP get into
the Govt. , then the agenda of the RSS for making the country, as Hindu country
shall stand irrelevant.
Now, the BJP
have come out with a new definition of politics, in India i.e., Maximum Contradictions
and ‘Common Minimum Program’ and form a Govt. of your suitability and if the
new definition comes to final shape, then the BJP have to take the diktat of
the PDP’s 5 points ‘Common Minimum Program’. Let us remind that the BJP have practiced the same definition of
politics, in the Maharashtra, with the Shiv Sena.
Sunday, 21 December 2014
Political Analysis of India: BJP have DNA to stoop low in Indian Politics
Political Analysis of India: BJP have DNA to stoop low in Indian Politics: The BJP have played a great role in their own enacted Drama to malign the Congress, before the last leg of assembly election in Jharkhand ...
BJP have DNA to stoop low in Indian Politics
The BJP have played a great
role in their own enacted Drama to malign the Congress, before the last leg of
assembly election in Jharkhand and Jammu and Kashmir, on the issue of missing
pages of the certain land deal file, between the Haryana Govt. and Mr. Robert
Vadra, who happens to be a Son in-law of the Congress President, Mrs Sonia
Gandhi.
The Govt. of Haryana, while
replying to the RTI of Mr. Ashok Khemka, did mention about the missing of the two important pages from the important
files, regarding the land deal, but did not owe the responsibility of their
failure to retain the important file, which was been the bone of contention,
during the time of election of the Haryana assembly.
The IAS Kehmka is supposed
to be playing in the hand of the present BJP Govt., since he did not mention
about the period of filing his RTI and unfortunately, with a dubious role, he
never made any allegation against the present Govt. for not providing the
certain required pages of the said file, the body language of Mr. Khemka,
during the interview before the news channels, have reflected that he was
scoring scores against Hooda Govt., who have deliberately suspended Mr. Khemka
for his honesty, in connection with the land deal of Mr Vadra.
The timing of the reply of
the said RTI, by the present BJP Govt., in Haryana, was conspicuous, due to the
reason of ongoing assembly election in the Jharkhand and Jammu and Kashmir. The
BJP, who is an expert in managing the news channels, through their under table
deals with the news channels, did use the news channels for their political
gains.
Unfortunately, the Indian
pious news channels did the same, what has been told by their Corporate House,
they, on frequent basis, have telecasted the issue of missing pages and the
statement of the Mr. Khemka. Nevertheless, the news channels did opt to seek
any explanation from the present Haryana Govt. for their failure to retain the
certain important pages of the said land deal, which was obvious to prove the
nexus between the BJP and the media.
There are several question
need to be answered by the Haryana Govt. that how the Govt. excavate said
missing file and copy of the said pages and why the BJP Govt. did not set an
enquiry for the missing file, since the Govt. must have taken time to reply the
said RTI and what was the Chemical theory which have brought back the pages in
the said file.
Friday, 12 December 2014
Modi Govt. know nothing about the Constitution of India, but ruling the country
The recent proposal made by the BJP, in the Parliament, for the Anti conversion bill is total against of the Article 25 of the Indian Constitution. It is shocking that the BJP Govt. have no idea or fair education, regarding the Article 25.
Before we go for the debate on the proposal of Anti- conversion, BJP ought to have taken the view of the Constitutional experts, before making controversy statement in the Parliament, on the issue of Anti Conversion Bill.
SECULARISM AND FREEDOM OF RELIGION :
This Article 25 guarantees that every person in India shall have the freedom of conscience and shall have the right to profess, practice and propagate religion, subject to the restrictions that may be imposed by the State on the following grounds, namely:-
(1) public order, morality and health;
(2) other provisions of the Constitution;
(3) regulation of non-religious activity associated with religious practice;
(4) social welfare and reform;
(5) throwing open of Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes of Hindus.
The freedom of religion conferred by this Article is not confined to citizens of India alone but extends to all persons including aliens and individuals exercising their rights either in their individual capacity or on behalf of some church or institution. Freedom of conscience connotes a person's right to entertain beliefs and doctrines concerning matters, which are regarded by him to be conducive to his spiritual well being.
A person has freedom to believe in the religious tenets of any sect or community. The right is not only to entertain such religious beliefs as may be approved by his judgment or conscience but also to exhibit his sentiments in overt acts as are enjoined by his religion. According to this Article, he may 'profess, practice and propagate his religion'.
To profess a religion means the right to declare freely and openly one's faith. Modes of worship considered by a religion to be its integral and essential part are also secured. He may propagate freely his religious views for the edification of others. Thus, freedom of conscience would be meaningless unless it is supplemented by the freedom of unhampered expression of spiritual conviction in word and action.
The right to propagate one's religion means the right to communicate the person's beliefs to another person or to expose the tenets of that faith, but would not include the right to convert another person to the former's faith, because the latter is equally entitled to freedom of conscience.
Of course, the latter person is free to adopt another religion in the free exercise of his conscience. Thus, Article 25(1) guarantees to every person not only the right to entertain such religious beliefs as may appeal to his conscience, but also the right to exhibit his belief in his conduct by such outward acts as may appear to him proper in order to spread his ideas for the benefit of others. Therefore, every person is guaranteed the freedom to practice his religion- or to spread it if he so wishes - if that freedom is not abused to commit crimes or indulge in anti social activities.
*********************************************************************************
4. Any attempt to impose a ban on all religious conversions would interfere with one's right to propagate one's religion under Article 25(1), apart from infringing the right to freedom of speech guaranteed under Article 19(1) of the Constitution. The Supreme Court has held that there is no fundamental right to convert another person to one's religion as such a right would infringe on the right to freedom of conscience guaranteed to all citizens of the country alike.
Before we go for the debate on the proposal of Anti- conversion, BJP ought to have taken the view of the Constitutional experts, before making controversy statement in the Parliament, on the issue of Anti Conversion Bill.
SECULARISM AND FREEDOM OF RELIGION :
This Article 25 guarantees that every person in India shall have the freedom of conscience and shall have the right to profess, practice and propagate religion, subject to the restrictions that may be imposed by the State on the following grounds, namely:-
(1) public order, morality and health;
(2) other provisions of the Constitution;
(3) regulation of non-religious activity associated with religious practice;
(4) social welfare and reform;
(5) throwing open of Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes of Hindus.
The freedom of religion conferred by this Article is not confined to citizens of India alone but extends to all persons including aliens and individuals exercising their rights either in their individual capacity or on behalf of some church or institution. Freedom of conscience connotes a person's right to entertain beliefs and doctrines concerning matters, which are regarded by him to be conducive to his spiritual well being.
A person has freedom to believe in the religious tenets of any sect or community. The right is not only to entertain such religious beliefs as may be approved by his judgment or conscience but also to exhibit his sentiments in overt acts as are enjoined by his religion. According to this Article, he may 'profess, practice and propagate his religion'.
To profess a religion means the right to declare freely and openly one's faith. Modes of worship considered by a religion to be its integral and essential part are also secured. He may propagate freely his religious views for the edification of others. Thus, freedom of conscience would be meaningless unless it is supplemented by the freedom of unhampered expression of spiritual conviction in word and action.
The right to propagate one's religion means the right to communicate the person's beliefs to another person or to expose the tenets of that faith, but would not include the right to convert another person to the former's faith, because the latter is equally entitled to freedom of conscience.
Of course, the latter person is free to adopt another religion in the free exercise of his conscience. Thus, Article 25(1) guarantees to every person not only the right to entertain such religious beliefs as may appeal to his conscience, but also the right to exhibit his belief in his conduct by such outward acts as may appear to him proper in order to spread his ideas for the benefit of others. Therefore, every person is guaranteed the freedom to practice his religion- or to spread it if he so wishes - if that freedom is not abused to commit crimes or indulge in anti social activities.
*********************************************************************************
4. Any attempt to impose a ban on all religious conversions would interfere with one's right to propagate one's religion under Article 25(1), apart from infringing the right to freedom of speech guaranteed under Article 19(1) of the Constitution. The Supreme Court has held that there is no fundamental right to convert another person to one's religion as such a right would infringe on the right to freedom of conscience guaranteed to all citizens of the country alike.
Wednesday, 10 December 2014
Political Analysis of India: Late Indra Gandhi was more courageous than PM Modi...
Political Analysis of India: Late Indra Gandhi was more courageous than PM Modi...: It is really shocking for the diehard supporters of PM Modi to know that the ‘Modi Magic’ is fading gradually, the recent rally of PM Modi...
Late Indra Gandhi was more courageous than PM Modi
It is really
shocking for the diehard supporters of PM Modi to know that the ‘Modi Magic’ is
fading gradually, the recent rally of PM Modi, in the Sher e Kasmir stadium, in
Kashmir, have proved to be hoax, when the BJP had to work hard to bring the
paid and crafted crowds for the rally of the PM. Modi.
Mr. Omar
Abdulla, the CM of Jammu and Kashmir have alleged in his Tweet that the people
from different region of the state and as well from Banihal of Jammu were being
brought in the rally. He furthered that he did not see a single banner, in the
hand of the people, who are being manipulated, by paying money, by the BJP, so
to prove the real crowds.
The former
separatist turned politician and current friend of the BJP, Mr. Sazzad Lone did
no left no stone unturned to fetch the paid crowds to the site of the rally, by
deploying 80 vehicles for this reason.
It is worth
mentioning that, in the year 2003, the then PM, Mr Atal Behari Bajpayee had
also address a rally, near to the same stadium and approximately 15,000 people
of Kashmir joined the rally. Even today, his said speech is remembered as Good
Friday Speech. Mr. Bajpayee also recited poetry of the famous Poet of Kashmir,
Mr. Gulam Ahmed, before the start of his address to the Kashmiri people.
The amazing
part of the PM Modi’s rally was that the Govt. of India had to deploy 4000
Security personals for the safety of a single person, which was more than the
security figures deployed for the US President, Mr. Barrack Obama. This reflect
that 56 inch chest reducing fast and melt down during the recent killing of our
Military Jawans, in Kashmir, by the Pakistan oriented extremists, by putting
some Lips condolences and tributes to the departed souls, which he could afford
that time, in wake of State’s election campaign.
When the BJP
is imitating the policies of the Congress (read as UPA 2), then why not the PM
Modi imitate the courage of Late Indra Gandhi, who did not bother of her life
and sacrificed the same, in the name of nation and also did not put off the
security personals, who were conspicuous, at that time.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)